I took this book out from a library many years ago. I've never forgotten it, it was so good and deserved a resurgence during the 'dinosaur' craze a few years back. My husband has never read it and is currently enjoying it. But I will still rate it 5 stars because I remember how good the story was and how well written of course - by Arthur Conan Doyle.

After his initial success Conan Doyle spent much of his literary career trying to break free from Sherlock Holmes but public pressure and the need for a good income kept the two inexorably bound. His historical novels found little success but he achieved more with his science fiction adventures of which The Lost World was by far the most successful. And rightly so. This tale of a hidden world is full of action with many mysteries to ponder. Just imagine the excitement of the readers of Strand Magazine as they waited for the next episode of the story to be published; just what creatures or predicaments would our heroes meet next? As far as I know Conan Doyle never travelled up the Amazon. He obtained his knowledge from other people’s accounts but his descriptions of the jungle are excellent and help to build the tension before they even reach the site of the lost world. Despite the age of the book and the language of the time I found it easy to read. Having the story written in the first person helped to maintain the tension and fear. The principle characters are those one would expect from an action story of that time, the relatively innocent narrator, the two irascible professors and everybody’s favourite, the all-action Lord John Roxton; sportsman, world explorer, British gentleman and all round good egg. The sort of character that we have seen parodied countless times. I was expecting action and mysterious creatures but my surprise was Conan Doyle’s humour. In particular I found myself laughing out loud at the chapter describing the lecture at the start of the book. To use the vernacular of the time the inaudible chairman was an absolute “hoot”. For several reasons The Lost World could not be written today. With the benefit of current knowledge it is hard to believe that such a mix of fauna could exist together in such a relatively small space. Also, any modern book would have a balanced mix of gender and race whereas here we have four upper class English male explorers, some Native South American bearers, a loyal “negro” servant and just two very stereotypical female characters with very minor roles. As is usual for Alma Classics there are a few pages of useful notes to explain some of the references to contemporary persons and literature. The cover has an outline drawing of what must be Lord John in jodhpurs and pith helmet, looking up at pterodactyls flying above. The book has a lively ending and promised more adventures for the leading characters which Conan Doyle fulfilled with several short stories and another book. The Lost World brightened up a couple of dull post-Christmas days and for sheer “ripping yarn” entertainment I have awarded five stars.

Two things first. Michael Crichton's the lost world has nothing to do with this book. They are completely seperate entities. (There are so many reviews around that seem to think they are linked) The second thing is, remember when it was written! Ok. Published in 1912 this was the epitome of action adventure at that time. Storytelling was very different 108 years ago and what may seem dull to us was not dull at the time. This is good story, one I've enjoyed reading several times over the 40 years since I first read it. It's hardly surprising that the attitudes of characters differ from now. What do people expect from a book over a century old? Read it in context with when it was published and it's still a good read.